Kicking Against a Prick

What struck me was that there was no real appeal to truth. It felt good, was the closest she came to defending her position. Our conversation opened with her observation that I missed social cues which resulted in rude behavior. Whereas she told me this triumphantly, in the way a doctor might when, finally diagnosing some troublesome set of symptoms, he would exclaim the name of his patient’s true illness, I stifled a laugh.

The charge is quite true, and the underlying cause is that I don’t care about social cues. I enjoy provoking people; it is fun to ruffle someone’s feathers; in my family, it’s just what we do to everyone. But the other side of the coin is a blindness to body language, a deafness to tone; it’s not just that I don’t care when I do notice social cues, half the time they fly over my head like little birds.

Smiling, I agreed. She then informed me that I needed weed. This would cure my latent rudeness. Disagreeing with this diagnosis, I explained that weed makes people stupid, and we spent a good while discussing the pros and cons of drug use.

From this point, and I don’t know how we progressed onto this subject, she started talking about what I’ll call dog rooms. At her university, during finals, students may visit a room full of strangers’ dogs—sometimes characterized as puppies—to relax. Unfortunately, she said this to a rather rude bloke who either didn’t pick up on her social cues or just didn’t care enough to try, and I simply stated my mind upon the subject.

I think this practice is childish. I may be wrong, and I don’t really care about the issue. I knew of dog rooms, and some part of me found it infantilizing. To counter my point, she replied that I was childish. She seemed upset, said she didn’t want to talk about it, and then the inquisition proceeded. We talked about it—she questioned me—for the next minute, and then I was placed into Coventry.

By now Coventry is a second home to me, and with a pair of earbuds and some podcasts, I may more than amply furnish my room. However, I was left with a few quandaries: Why did she take it personally when I called dog rooms childish? Why, to counter my position, did she proceed to behave childishly? If my attempts at honest discussion end discussion, is it better to live life a spineless coward, only ever engaging in the shallows of discourse?

This dialog seems emblematic of my life: I have grown to expect being cast out as a jerk, have grown used to solitude within groups I once called friends. I fear I’ve grown into something of a porcupine, my indiscriminate pricks at once my defense and the cause of my trouble. I must find others like me.

(Not the first time she and I disagreed. Read more about it here, The Impersonal God, and Pentecost 2018. More on the subject of losing friends due to my personality, Mad World.)

1 Comment

  1. I’ve always found it difficult discussing ideas with people. They either change the subject or get argumentative. Rarely is there respectful give and take. Many people tend to view conversation as a competition, a power play. I think that’s especially true today. Not that I’m innocent in these things. In the past, I’ve been overly sensitive to overly opinionated people, but I think I’m improving there. I think there’s a shortage of humility these days when it comes to conversation. 1 Peter 3:15 is a good guideline for dialogue. “But in your hearts set apart Christ as Lord. Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect.” So, truth is important, but it should be seasoned with gentleness and respect.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.